When the internet comes from heaven, but it will not be more powerful than the basement. A comparison that you need to know before deciding your future in terms of connectivity. Starlink VS. Optics: what is the best solution? We analyze it for you.
Starlink It is a salvation for the countryside, but in the city there is only an exotic choice. Optical internet, though boring classicstill reigns sovereign in terms of speed, stability and price. If you live among the meadows, continue reading. But if you are in a building with lift, click immediately on “Order the Opticaphaqui Starlink against optics: what is the best solution?
Who has more coverage: the satellite or the cable?
Starlink uses a constellation of satellites in low terrestrial orbit (Leo), which allows almost global coverage – Even in the most remote European villages, where the perspective is still just a promise on electoral flyers. According to the data of 2023, The EU reaches the 70 % fiber optic coverage (FTTH/B)for which Rural areas are still late. This means that Starlink is currently filling a void, both literally and symbolically. At the same time, in the last period, it also surprises with its price policy, since the Starlink price is only 50 euros per month. Starlink against optics: in this case, Starlink wins clearly.
Speed: who holds the record of the internet?
Starlink offers speed da 50 a 220 Mbpswhich is fantastic for the internet via satellite. Their “priority” plan can reach 220 Mbps, while the typical speed of homes is between 100 and 200 Mbps. But when do you turn on the perspective? Speeds reach 1 Gbpsin some cases even up to 8.000 Mbps. In other words: The perspective is hypersonic, Starlink is a reaction drone. Starlink against optics: in this case, the perspective wins clearly.
Latency: the latter count, but the milliseconds are crucial
And this is where Starlink loses some star. His latency is 15–40 mswhich is much better than the classic satellite internet, which has a latency greater than 500 ms. A The perspective reaches a latency of less than 10 mswhich means best video calls, faster game responses and more stable connections. Even compared to mobile networks (5G NSA and LTE), Starlink is lower, especially in stability E response time. Starlink against optics: in this case, the perspective wins clearly.
Reliability: When the weather decides your zoom call
If the sun shines, Starlink works perfectly. But what happens when it rains, it snows or is the sky covered? You can expect signal loss and increased latency. Studies show that latency doubles during moderate rains. In the meantime, the perspective behaves as if there was no bad weather out – rooted and unwavering.
Cost: initial investment or long -term benefit?
Starlink: 0€ for the equipmentThen monthly starting from € 50 and binding for 12 months. Or buy equipment for 349 euros and then 50 euros per month (May 2025) Optics? € 50–100 per monthoften without an initial investment. (even if the operator lends us the optical router) in many cases, the providers also offer promotional prices, which means that The perspective wins in the long term, both for the portfolio and for the head. However, these optics suppliers also sell many other things you don’t need. For example, access to classical television.
See also
Why should anyone choose Starlink?
When there is no optics and you absolutely have to look at Netflix
Per Users in rural areasv camperv mountain shelters Oh with weekend in Istria It is Starlink The only sensible choice. For those who need mobile solution or they are found in a region without cable infrastructure, Starlink revolution. But for urban users? No. Here is the perspective connectivity queen.
Comparative table: Starlink VS. Optics
| I wait | Starlink | Optics |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Global, ideal for rural areas | 70 % EU (2023), urban areas |
| Speed | 50–300 Mbps | Up to 8,000 Mbps, often> 1 Gbps |
| Latency | 15–40 ms | |
| Reliability | Sensitive to weather | High, independent of weather conditions |
| Costs | 0 € equipment, 50 €/month | € 40–100/month, rental equipment |
| Fitness | Rural areas, mobility | Urban areas, demanding applications |
Conclusion: Heaven is the limit, as well as the cable – Starlink against optical fiber
Starlink is A fantastic solution for those who have no choice – And for this it deserves an applause. But for most EU residents who live in cities or nearbyAnd optics without competition. Higher speeds, lower latency, greater stability and lower costs mean that The optical connection is still the queen of the digital era. By 2030, the EU wants to guarantee 100% copertura gigabitwhich means that Starlink will remain the wind behind the countrysidebut not the main engine of the digital future. If latency is not a problem for you, if you want greater privacy from the operator and you no longer watch the TV, it seems that in 2025 Starlink will be a more convenient choice, given that the package costs only 50 euros.
